In recent years, Product Management has become one of the most aspirational career paths in the tech and digital economy. It’s often portrayed as a role anyone can break into if they master a few soft skills, ace a bootcamp, or learn to “influence without authority.” Stories circulate of individuals making massive salary jumps—sometimes from teaching, sales, or support roles—to high-compensation Product Manager (PM) positions. These narratives, while inspiring, frequently oversimplify the reality of product leadership.
A viral post recently suggested that the secret to becoming a seven-figure PM is simple: people skills. According to the author, if you are good with people—and can influence them—everything else in product management “falls into place.” Technical tools, frameworks, and methodologies, they argue, are logistics that can be learned in a week. Influence, not expertise, is positioned as the core driver of success.
This narrative resonates emotionally, but it misrepresents the actual discipline of product management. While influence, communication, and trust are undeniably important, they are not enough to succeed in the role—let alone thrive in complex, high-stakes, high-compensation environments.
The reality is this:
Product management is a craft that demands years of experience, extensive exposure to complex systems, deep cross-functional judgment, and the ability to foresee long-term business, customer, and technical implications.
Not everyone can do this work. And that is not gatekeeping—it is an honest reflection of the role’s real complexity and responsibility.
This article breaks down why product management requires significantly more than people skills, and why oversimplified success stories can set unrealistic expectations for aspiring PMs.
At the core of the original post is the claim that product management rests primarily on the “People” pillar—trust, influence, and relationships. The author argues that Product Managers succeed by convincing engineers, leaders, interviewers, and customers to trust their vision. Tools like Jira or SQL are treated as learnable afterthoughts.
The problem with this view is not that it is entirely wrong. Product management does require exceptional interpersonal skills. PMs must influence without authority, align conflicting stakeholders, and transform ambiguity into direction. Trust is fundamental.
However, the leap from “people skills matter” to “people skills are enough” is dangerously incomplete.
Influence alone cannot:
• Validate a market
• Interpret ambiguous metrics
• Architect a scalable product
• Decide on trade-offs between security, performance, and cost
• Prioritize roadmap items across competing business goals
• Identify emerging risks
• Predict customer behaviour
• Diagnose root causes in product failures
• Build a cohesive product strategy
These responsibilities require judgment—judgment that only emerges through experience, context, exposure, and deep critical thinking.
Influence can convince people to take action.
Wisdom determines what action should be taken.
And wisdom is not a learn-in-a-week skill.
A Product Manager’s job is not to “convince people to trust your vision.”
A PM’s job is to build a vision worth trusting.
Great PMs are not charismatic persuaders—they are disciplined thinkers, pattern recognizers, and decision architects who synthesize insights from customers, markets, technology, and business economics.
Here’s what the influencer-centric view ignores:
PMs must understand how today’s decisions ripple across the next:
• quarter
• year
• product cycle
• market evolution
For instance:
A seemingly small UX decision might increase support ticket volume by 300%.
A short-term speed fix might increase long-term technical debt by $2 million.
A promotional feature that boosts sign-ups might reduce activation rates, harming long-term retention.
Choosing the wrong architecture today may prevent the company from scaling internationally later.
These are not decisions solved by influence.
They are solved by insight, analytical rigor, and strategic foresight.
Not everyone naturally thinks in long-term cause-and-effect chains.
Not everyone is wired to imagine downstream implications.
PMs must.
Scalability is one of the most underestimated dimensions of product work. It influences every layer of a product’s lifecycle:
• infrastructure scalability
• user onboarding scalability
• workflow scalability
• pricing scalability
• support scalability
• data scalability
A non-scalable decision at 1,000 users becomes a catastrophic bottleneck at 100,000 users.
Understanding scalability requires exposure to:
high-volume systems
performance constraints
multi-market deployments
backend architecture considerations
user behavior patterns at scale
Influence does not teach you these things.
Experience does.
Good PMs do not just listen to customers—they interpret what customers mean, not what they say.
This requires:
knowledge of cognitive biases
qualitative research experience
behavioral economics
usability testing
ethnographic research exposure
understanding of friction points in digital experiences
A teacher, sales rep, or operations specialist may understand people in a general sense—but customer behavior within digital product ecosystems follows specific psychological patterns. Recognizing these requires specialized exposure and practice.
You cannot influence your way through misunderstood customer needs.
You must investigate, analyze, and synthesize them.
Every PM makes hundreds of decisions per quarter:
• Which customer segments matter most?
• What metrics matter now vs. later?
• Should we build or buy?
• Should we launch fast or wait for quality?
• Should we kill an underperforming feature?
• Should we push engineering or pivot strategically?
These decisions often lack perfect data, and the consequences are measurable in revenue, churn, user trust, regulatory risk, or operational cost.
This is not something influence alone can solve.
It requires judgment.
Judgment is the product of:
iterated exposure to complex challenges
learning from failures and consequences
pattern recognition
experience with real-world product trade-offs
Judgment cannot be taught in a course.
It cannot be “influenced” into existence.
It cannot be rushed.
The myth that PMs “don’t need to be technical” persists, but it is misguided. PMs may not write code, but they must understand:
system architecture
APIs
integration patterns
database constraints
security concerns
data flows
cloud environments
technical debt implications
This is not optional.
This is required for making responsible decisions.
Influencing engineers without understanding what they are talking about is not leadership—it is recklessness.
High-performing PMs think like business strategists:
competitive positioning
unit economics
CAC, LTV, retention
marketplace dynamics
pricing and monetization
regulatory environments
industry best practices
If a PM cannot understand business fundamentals, they cannot formulate a profitable strategy—even if engineers and stakeholders like them personally.
Charisma does not compensate for a weak strategy.
Influence does not replace business sense.
Posts claiming that “influence and people skills are all you need” create harmful misconceptions for aspiring PMs.
In reality, the role demands multi-year development and cross-disciplinary exposure.
In truth, the job is fundamentally about decision-making, not persuasion.
Modern PMs who lack technical literacy struggle to lead engineering-driven organizations.
They are not. Each person’s path depends on timing, industry, mentorship, opportunity, and personal aptitude.
Oversimplified narratives set people up for frustration, imposter syndrome, and unrealistic expectations. They encourage candidates to underestimate the craft and overestimate the impact of charisma.
This does a disservice to the profession and to the individuals who aspire to join it.
Product management is neither elitist nor inaccessible. Many people do transition into PM roles from nontraditional backgrounds—including teachers, analysts, designers, consultants, and entrepreneurs.
But the individuals who succeed long-term typically possess:
• strong analytical abilities
• comfort with ambiguity
• product intuition
• customer empathy
• business strategy literacy
• technical curiosity
• prioritization discipline
• resilience in conflict
• a willingness to be accountable for outcomes
These traits are not universally distributed.
That is why not everyone can—or should—be a Product Manager.
To claim the opposite is to diminish the expertise of those who have spent years refining this craft.
The original post is correct about one thing: influence matters.
PMs convince, align, and motivate people across the organization.
But here is the more complete reality:
Influence is only powerful when backed by competence.
You cannot influence your way to:
a scalable architecture
a validated product hypothesis
a defensible business case
a usable design
a resilient platform
a market advantage
a sustainable roadmap
Influence without competence is manipulation.
Competence without influence is isolation.
Product management requires both.
But competence takes longer to develop—and cannot be skipped.
A PM’s decisions can:
• break a product
• cost millions
• disappoint customers
• reduce performance
• create team burnout
• compromise security
• damage the brand
• waste years of development effort
Or, in contrast, a PM’s choices can:
• grow revenue
• expand into new markets
• streamline workflows
• deepen customer loyalty
• unlock technical scale
• create measurable business outcomes
These outcomes depend on far more than influence.
They depend on the quality of the PM’s thought process.
The idea that “anyone can be a Product Manager if they have people skills” is not only misleading—it undervalues the complexity of the role and the discipline it represents.
Yes, people skills matter.
Yes, trust is essential.
Yes, influence is part of the job.
But:
Influence without insight is empty.
Charisma without judgment is dangerous.
Trust without competence is short-lived.
Soft skills cannot replace product thinking.
Product management is a multifaceted craft that blends human behavior, business strategy, and technical systems. It requires years of experience, repeated exposure to real-world challenges, and the ability to foresee second-order consequences.
Not everyone can do this work.
And that is precisely why great Product Managers are valuable.
The truth is simple:
If everyone could be a Product Manager, the role would not exist.
🚀 Let’s build something extraordinary together. Contact us today for a free consultation!
Contact us
We create your custom software, while you focus on growing your business
COPYRIGHT © 2025 JETX MEDIA INC. – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
